The Traditional Anglican Church of Canada Take on the Situation in Canada
October 27, 2012 17 Comments
In Virtue Online:
The Traditional Anglican Church of Canada, formed and incorporated in 2010 after the Ordinariate controversy divided the Anglican Catholic Church of Canada, has linked itself as a “missionary district” with the Anglican Catholic Church Original Province worldwide, while maintaining links as well with the Anglican Province of Christ the King. The Rev. Father Robert Mansfield of St John’s, Parry Sound, Ontario, convener of the synod, will serve as Vicar- General.
The province was taken at the young church’s initial synod, held October 23-25 at Queen of Apostles Renewal Centre in Mississauga near Toronto, Canada, ironically the location where an attempt was made earlier to form an Ordinariate in Canada.
A highlight of this gathering was the ordination of The Reverend George Betsos to the Sacred Order of Deacons by Archbishop James Provence of the APCK, to serve as Assistant Curate in Saint Mark’s Parish, Victoria, British Columbia. Betsos holds the Master of Divinity degree from the University of Toronto and a degree in psychotherapy. He will join the Victoria congregation later this year.
Archbishop Mark Haverland gave the address and charge to the ordinand. This was the third ordination to the diaconate this year for Canadian traditionalists: the others were of The Rev. Steven Beyer of Holy Trinity & St Jude, Thunder Bay, and The Rev. Jonathan Carrothers of St Mark’s, Victoria.
Archbishop Mark Haverland (ACCOP) presided at the meeting, which approved the “missionary” status of the Traditional Anglican Church of Canada unanimously. Thus the original eight parishes will be affiliated with 250 ACCOP parishes in the U.S., U.K., India, Africa, and Asia. The connection between St Mark’s in Victoria and the APCK, formed before the other parishes existed or had withdrawn from the ACCC, has the approval of Archbishop Haverland, who strongly supported the parish’s wish to continue this connection whilst maintaining full participation in the Canada-wide organisation. The two archbishops presented a united front and spoke movingly to the assembled clergy and lay leaders.
The theme of the synod was “Pastoral Availability and Organisational Stability,” and speakers from each of the parish described the efforts being made to implement the aims of the Traditional Anglican Church. A series of addresses on the theme given by The Rev. Father Stanley Sinclair of Victoria will be published.
Mrs. Marie Tetlow was chosen as secretary by acclamation. The five-member elected executive council of the TACC will remain in place, but a treasurer and a chancellor must be found. Dr Millo Shaw of Thunder Bay, who drafted the Constitution, asked to be relieved as Chancellor because of the pressure of work.
The Anglican Catholic Church in the U.S. was formed in 1978 as the aftermath of the Congress of St Louis a year before, which brought together thousands of disaffected traditional Anglicans, who wanted to maintain their tradition unimpaired by the changes made in the American and Canadian churches, replacing the Prayer Book with contemporary rites that diminished orthodoxy, and approving the ordination of women; although other issues were also involved. ACCOP and ACPK were created as the outcome of the “Affirmation of St Louis.”
The Anglican Catholic Church of Canada began under Archbishop Robert Morse of APCK, who had taken the Victoria congregation founded by former bishop Peter Wilkinson [St Athanasius, later St John the Evangelist] under its wing prior to the formation of the Canadian body. At a 2010 synod near Vancouver the ACCC voted to join in an Ordinariate, but subsequently the parishes in Victoria and Halifax withdrew, and other parishes had a long period of uncertainty. Some have still not made a decision about their future affiliation. The Church of the Resurrection, Walkerville [Windsor], ON, under The Rev. Fr. James Chantler, voted to join the ACCOP prior to this development.
The Traditional Anglican Communion was formed as an international body in 1991, under Archbishop Hepworth, who after much controversy intervening is now a Roman Catholic layman. He gave the impression on a swing round the international TAC circuit that the church was seeking uniate status.
The appeal to the Vatican had actually been made by Evangelical bishops in the Church of England to the Vatican. Given the very cordial interaction through the Anglican Roman Catholic International Commission, it was thought that a way might be found to establish a “uniate” relationship. In 2005 the proposed terms were presented to the English bishops as well as to TAC bishops at a meeting in Washington, DC, with Cardinal Wuerl.
At that time unknown to the rank and file membership, most of the bishops of the Traditional Anglican Communion had signed the Catechism of the Catholic Church at a meeting in Portsmouth, England in 2007. [This was a tacit approval of papal infallibility, transubstantiation, and Marian dogmas adopted by Rome in the 19th and 20th centuries, along with the Catholic faith of the "undivided church" prior to the Great Schism.]
The publication of Anglicanorum Coetibus in 2009 made Anglican Catholics in Canada aware that under its terms the eligible clergy must be re-ordained and re-trained, and laity would undergo some rite, either Confirmation or Chrismation, at the hands of a Roman bishop.
When the Vatican document was released the now former Archbishop John Hepworth and other bishops denied that it meant the necessity of becoming Roman Catholic ["we will be united, not absorbed"], although subsequent events showed that this was indeed expected. In Canada two out of three ACCC bishops have now been laicised, although they are seeking Roman Catholic ordination, along with several ACCC clergy. Bishop Craig Botterill of Halifax, Nova Scotia, is the remaining ordinary of the ACCC.
So far there is no Ordinariate in Canada, but “fellowships” in Ottawa and Victoria, related to the “Anglican Use” and Ordinariate parishes in the U.S. One lone Anglican parish, historic St John the Evangelist, Calgary, has joined the “Anglican Use” group. At the moment these congregations have no clergy of their own but rely on regular R.C. clergy for ministrations. This of course reflects the very limited interest expressed in the Ordinariate proposal by Anglicans in the U.K., Australia, India and Africa.
Squabbling half-truths. A poor, yet typical, Virtue post.

(i) Mr Virtue’s personal favourite seems to be ACNA at the moment (though it used to be AMIA). Yet the problem with ACNA is their ambiguous position towards WO. Some critics have described ACNA as TEC twenty years ago. This is probably why those Canadians have chosen a different continuing affiliation.
(ii) With respect to some of Mr Virtue’s staments about the Ordinariate, “half-truths” is rather a euphemism. Anyway, once the Canadian Deanery is officially established and more Canadian clergy is (re)ordained (in addition to those already serving in Calgary), which will hopefully happen on December 8th and then around Easter 2013, the Ordinariate structure in Canada will become more firm and perhaps more compelling to those who have not made their mind yet. Sometimes, we all seem to forget that the CSP Ordinariate is just nine months old and its Canadian branch is probably something like six months old (as the idea of joining the US Ordinariate was put forward even later).
I would rather see the continuing ACCC people go the ACCOP/APCK route than the APA/ACA route. Poor Mr. Virtue does seem a bit lost among all the groups as to his preference.
As far as the ACNA goes, I was excited at first until I heard (Arch)Bishop Duncan proclaim his support for women’s ordination and then saw their liturgical celebrations facing the people, just like NOM Rome. Sad.
Actually, VirtueOnline has just reported that ACNA has established a Theological Task Force to carry out a thorough study regarding the ordination of women to Holy Orders and that both integrities (i.e. both views on WO) are to be represented.
http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=16707
I wonder what the reasons are that the continuing Anglican movement which initially seemed quite capable of preserving the best of Anglicanism now seems more and more doomed by either endless divisions and regrouping or adopting a trajectory which inevitably leads to the point in which CofE or TEC are now; bright and shining exceptions in the continuing spectrum being TAC communions in countries with no Ordinariates.
The weakness of the whole Church Catholic is too obvious, and this includes Rome! When will we realize that postmodernity has deeply affected both church and culture!
Ironic that The Canadian deanery will be bigger and m ore viable than the Australian ordinariate..although we are dealing with tiny numbers, every soul is precious to our Lord. Stop worrying about Rome, our Irish friend…keep your mind on your own soul.Take your sun glasses off!
I am a Low-Church Anglican mate, and I will pastor-shepherd & teach as I feel and see that God has called me! And “Rome” has been in biblical & theological error in her long history, and still fails to see the Gospel correctly, in many places. That’s the way I see it, as a Reformed & Reformational Christian. It’s about as simple as that! And you too should “keep in mind” your soul! For one of us is certainly way wrong here, and I don’t see it as myself, since I believe the Word of God, simply & hopefully profoundly in some manner. And as I keep seeking to hammer home, our salvation is “Christ Jesus” seated on the Throne of Glory above, ‘In sesson’ for the true Church & Redeemed of God…HE, Christ, is prophet, priest & king, that Glory in “Himself”! (Heb. 1:3 ; 9: 24)
Btw, do you read Holy Scripture? If so, I just don’t it? The R. Catholics I know that love the Lord, love the Word of God and read it, and this reality shows! Zeal btw, must always have “knowledge”, and that knowledge is only in God’s “Righteousness” and Word! (Rom. 10: 1-4). Thank GOD our rest and salvation Christ!
So is the former Archbishop Hepworth now a RC layman? Does somebody have the truthful answer please
I do not think you can expect a single answer. From the viewpoint of the Catholic Church, Mr Hepworth is a former Catholic Priest who is not presently in good standing with his diocesan. I know not whether he has been reduced to the lay state or reconciled. What his standing is in the various bodies which have purported to have him as part of their clergy is a matter for those bodies. The TAC has purported to strip him of his primacy in that body and also to inhibit him from the exercise of any exercise of whatever ministry he might have had.
Mr Virtue’s blog describes itself as the “the Voice for Global Orthodox Anglicanism”. But there is a problem with that masthead. Where does one go to ascertain what constitutes Anglican orthodoxy?
One might begin by looking at the website of The Anglican Communion where one discovers that what it describes as “the instruments of communion” are: (i) The Archbishops of Canterbury; (ii) The Lambeth Conferences; (iii) The Meetings of Primates; and Anglican Consultative Conferences. But one can drill down through the pages and links and nowhere is there any mechanism for determining what constitutes othodox belief.
We can look at the Church of England. In constitutional theory, the CofE is a creature of the state. Its belief, doctrine and discipline are a matter for the legislature. Although those functions have been delegated to the CofE General Synod, it is only delegation. Parliament can and does put pressure on the Synod. An example is to be found in the official transcript of Parliamentary proceedings [Hansard] for 25th October 2012 Hansard – House of Commons – Oral Answers to Questions 25 Oct 2012. Scroll down on the link to the questions to the Church Commissioners.
“Mr Bradshaw: In his conversations with the bishops, will the hon. Gentleman tell them that just because House of Lords reform has been abandoned they should not feel any less pressure to do this and that a failure to agree a Measure that gives women bishops equal status with male bishops would still lead to a severe constitutional crisis between Church and state?”
The wording may be a little more polite than under Elizabeth I, but no less imperative for all that. So far as the CofE is concerned orthodoxy is ultimately a matter for the will of the UK Parliament.
Mr Virtue’s opinion and his blog purport to give a voice to something which does not in fact exist. Absent a body with teaching and disciplinary authority for the whole Anglican Communion, there can be no definition of what constitutes “global Anglican orthodox belief.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorham_judgement
This is why Manning became a Catholic. Nothing changes does it. The state church is always hampered by Parliament supported by the Judiciary
I would think that evangelical beliefs coupled with the Book of Common Prayer and 39 Articles are David Virtue’s idea of orthodox Anglicanism.
Thank you! This, and this only can be what historical and classic Anglicanism is, “Reformed” (Reformational) and Evangelical! And in reality this is certainly what the Thirty-Nine Articles measure.
And the 39 Articles are certainly incompatible with what the TAC bishops signed at Portsmouth.
Duh! No kidd’in the TAC bishops at Portsmouth, as they appear generally, want to be in some kind of communion with Rome, or some thought they wanted to be? This has long been a desire of the Anglo-Catholics in general, and with the AC we will see if this works itself out, at least as any real Anglican patrimony? I wish them well to some degree, but of course Evangelical and “Reformed” Anglicanism simply cannot go there. Nor will I!
Ben Bradshaw MP is an out gay and partnered man.
So are some CoE clergy – so ?
And who knows how many “gay” priests Rome has?