Msgr Jeffrey Steenson – Witness on Salt and Light TV


HT

 

Anglican Ordinariate Secure

Leaders of the Anglican Ordinariate urged patience and restraint in light of statements by the Bishop of Argentina that Pope Francis did not favor the creation of a home for Anglicans in the Catholic Church.

George Conger reports:

In a note released after the election of Pope Francis on 13 March 2013, the Bishop of Argentina and former primate of the Anglican Church of the Southern Cone, the Most Rev. Gregory Venables, said Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio was, in his experience, “consistently humble and wise, outstandingly gifted yet a common man” who had been a friend to Anglicans in Argentina.

Bishop Venables said Cardinal Bergoglio “called me to have breakfast with him one morning and told me very clearly that the Ordinariate was quite unnecessary and that the church needs us as Anglicans.”

He later clarified his statement noting the cardinal’s comments were more an affirmation of Anglicanism than criticism of the Ordinariate.

The report from Bishop Venables sparked controversy in the British press and speculation Francis might adopt the different tone than his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI. A spokesman for the English Ordinariate denied any change was in the offing telling the Telegraph the comments were Bishop Venables’ not the Pope’s.

Following the resignation of Pope Benedict last month, Msgr. Jeffrey Steenson, Ordinary of the Chair of St. Peter, said: “We members of the Ordinariate are in a particular way the spiritual children of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI.  Throughout his years as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and especially as Pope, the reconciliation of Anglicans to the Catholic Church has been one of his principal tasks.”

He noted that “when Pope Benedict issued the apostolic constitution Anglicanorum coetibus in November 2009, he laid a permanent foundation for the Ordinariate, to be the means to reconcile Anglican groups to the Catholic Church and that this Anglican patrimony might be shared with the Catholic Church.  While the Ordinariate has been a special intention of Pope Benedict, it is now firmly established in the Catholic Church and will continue to serve as an instrument for Christian unity.”

Msgr. Steenson said the transition between Popes “should not greatly impact the work of the Ordinariate.  We should probably expect that the ordinations of our candidates could be delayed slightly, as the Pope must approve these petitions.”

Following the publication of Bishop Venables’ remarks Msgr. Steenson said he had received a number of inquiries from those “who are concerned about what our new Pope’s attitude may be toward the Ordinariates, occasioned by an anecdotal report from an Anglican bishop in Argentina.”

He reaffirmed the “real permanence and stability” of the Ordinariate within the Catholic Church, and added “but it is even more important to remember what it means to be Catholic, to have the full assurance that faith brings. Christ the Good Shepherd entrusted the governance of the Church to St. Peter and his successors. To be in communion with Peter brings a confidence we never knew as Anglicans. Pope Francis understands the pilgrim character of our communities and will be a wise and caring pastor to us,” Msgr. Steenson said.

 

Fr Peter Wilkinson Given the Title of Monsignor

Peregrinus has the news:

Dateline: Houston, Texas
Feast of the Presentation, 2013

In the presence of three cardinals, bishops and staff of the Seminary of St. Mary in Houston along with deacons, priests with their wives and candidates for ordination for the Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter, Msgr Jeffrey Steenson on the seminary stage announced that the Holy Father has made Fr. Peter Wilkinson a prelate of honour with the title of Monsignor.

This is a wonderful recognition of Msgr Wilkinson’s past service to his people in Canada as an Anglican bishop. As well, Pope Benedict, has recognized the sacrifice and faithfulness Msgr Peter has shown in shepherding his people into the full communion of the Catholic Church.

With his usual humility and grace Msgr Wilkinson dedicated this honour to the clergy, their wives and the people of his former diocese now in communion with the Holy Father.

With great thanks to God the Canadian Deanery of St. John the Baptist now has a monsignor as well as a fine dean. May God bless the Deanery as we walk in the Year of Faith and give us grace to proclaim Christ to all in the New Evangelization in the unity of communion to which we are called.

 

Fr Carl Reid’s Ordinariate Ordination

Fr Carl Reid is a former TAC Bishop. Deborah Gyapong has the post with plenty of photos.

She also has the notes of the homily by Msgr Jeffrey Steenson here.

 

Leader of Anglican Ordinariate Recalls Joy of First Year

CNA:

Almost a year after being appointed to shepherd Anglican communities seeking to join the Catholic Church, Monsignor Jeffrey N. Steenson says the past months have been showered with blessings.

“I think the real joys have been to see communities that have struggled with the decision of discerning whether to become Catholic and have made that choice, and they have come in,” he told CNA in a November interview.

He described “the joy on their faces” as they enter the Catholic Church and said, “That’s the thing that sticks in my mind the most.”

Msgr. Steenson leads the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter, which was canonically erected on Jan. 1, 2012. Pope Benedict XVI approved the creation of the ordinariate, which is similar to a diocese but includes communities throughout the entire U.S. and Canada.

Based in Houston, the ordinariate allows for entire communities to enter into full communion with the Catholic Church while retaining elements of their Anglican heritage and liturgical practices, such as the Book of Common Prayer.

As of Nov. 1, the ordinariate included 1,336 members. It contains 23 priests, 69 seminarians and 35 communities, including large groups in Texas, Maryland, Florida and Pennsylvania.

A former Episcopal bishop, Msgr. Steenson and his wife entered the Catholic Church in 2007, and he was ordained a Catholic priest in 2009.

He holds a doctorate in patristics – the study of the Early Church Fathers – from Oxford University and played an important role in designing the formation program for former Anglican priests who seek to be ordained under the new ordinariate.

Because he is married, Msgr. Steenson cannot be a bishop. Instead, he is an “ordinary,” who carries all the authority of a bishop except that of being able to ordain priests.

The past year has brought both joys and challenges for the new ordinariate. Msgr. Steenson said that he has to be “very patient with people because this is a big, life-changing decision for them,” and for some people, “all of their mind isn’t really there at the same time.”

“Sometimes people think that it’s a very simple matter to become a Catholic, that it’s like changing your uniform,” he reflected. “That’s not the way it is. It requires a profound transformation at so many levels.”

“It’s challenging, because not everybody sees that right away in the middle of this,” he explained.

It is also important to ensure that those who are entering the Church “are genuinely becoming Catholic and not just running away from something,” he said, adding that the ordinariate cannot simply be a “refugee community.”

Among those who have chosen to become members of the ordinariate, Msgr. Steenson has seen a common understanding that “we need Peter.”

“I think they’re very grateful, too, to the Catholic Church for making it possible for them to continue with a tradition of prayer and worship that they’ve known all along,” he said, noting that some people who had previously converted and found themselves missing “the prayers that shaped their lives” are now joining ordinariate communities.

Over the past year, Msgr. Steenson has found great encouragement in the “incredible support” of American Catholics, particularly the U.S. bishops.

“We’re small, we’re starting modestly, and yet the excitement and the support from people have been really, really great,” he said.

He described how numerous diocesan bishops have “gone way beyond the call of duty,” helping to fund initial assessments and health insurance for some men in the ordinariate priesthood and finding positions for them during their transition period.

In addition, Msgr. Steenson said that he has begun to develop a deep friendship with the bishops.

“It’s really quite astonishing how welcoming they’ve been,” he said. “I feel it’s home for me now.”

The current Year of Faith is a special blessing for members of the ordinariate, Msgr. Steenson said. During the year, which runs Oct. 11, 2012 – Nov. 24, 2013, the Holy Father is encouraging Catholics to grow in their faith through prayer and study of Vatican II and the catechism.

Msgr. Steenson explained that the catechism “has been our textbook.” He hopes that both clergy and laity in the ordinariate will come to know the catechism cover-to-cover and recognize it as an incredible resource as they move forward in their new faith.

Even before his conversion, Msgr. Steenson said that he had been using the Catholic catechism. He recalled his time as an Episcopal priest in the 1990s, feeling lost and wondering where he could find the resources to teach his people the faith. He was attracted by the rich substance in the catechism, which he views as “an incredible intellectual achievement.”

Looking forward, Msgr. Steenson hopes that the ordinariate will be able to grow in its relationship with the rest of the Church and provide “a real enrichment of Catholic life with this culture and patrimony.”

“We’re never going to lose our accent,” he said. “And in many different ways, we’ll be able to bring that gift into Catholic life.”

 

Msgr Steenson Addresses the USCCB Plenary

As Deborah Gyapong reports:

Msgr. Jeffrey Steenson  gave a report this afternoon on the progress of the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops that was livestreamed via the usccb.org website.

I took notes.  Here are some highlights of his talk.  (I missed the beginning).

Msgr. Steenson told the American bishops the Ordinariate has three employees, but can only afford to pay for one, the executive assistant.   The Washington D.C. diocese is providing Fr. Scott Hurd for three years who is vicar general, and Steenson receives his sustenance from the Galveston-Houston archdiocese by teaching patristics at St. Mary’s Seminary in Houston.

He described “a very busy life doing administrative work and teaching at the same time.”

“The human mind is not designed to teach and do administration at the same time,” he said, to laughter from the bishops.

He spoke of the formation of clergy, noting the second formation for clergy from the U.S. and Canada would be starting soon.   “It’s a very accelerated program of four or five months,” he said.

It’s already been used twice in the United Kingdom, and was approved the CDF two years ago.

“We teach these classes at St. Mary’s Seminary through a marvelous distance learning” program?  that was a gift of the Knights of the Columbus.

The lectures are structured on the Catechism, he said.  ”We do not underestimate the challenges of forming priests.”

“I’m all too aware of the awesome steps of moving into full communion” and then into the priesthood so quickly, he said.

“We will have to notch up the question of post-ordination training in the future.”

“How are you going to pay for them?” he said is another “nightmare that has plagued my life” and that of his colleague Keith Newton.

He’s called for a prospective priests to provide a signed statement outlining their financial condition, including their future compensation, resources, indebtedness, retirement resources, saying he will only go forward when they are satisfied a priest can support himself.

Ordinariate clergy are allowed to receive compensation from work in local dioceses as well as from “compatible secular professions so we can provide adequate financial support.”

The Holy See has given instruction on how to establish Ordinariate communities, he said, noting the Pope called for close cooperation with local bishops.

“We’ve had our governing statutes approved,” he said. “The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) has joined with us in asking for a deanery for canada and we have also set up particular norms which have been approved” ….(missed which dicastery approved them.)

Steenson said he wished to “pay tribute” to the Episcopal Delegate Cardinal Wuerl for his “wise counsel in laying the foundatinos for the Ordinariate.”

He also thanked him for helping to “found us under the title of the Chair of St. Peter, something we carry with great pride.”

Galvestan-Houston Cardinal DiNardo  thanked Msgr. Steenson and his work and his “Catholic heart and mind to bring some very yearning priests and people to full coming with Rome whose reaction to all this is with thanksgiving and joy.

An Archbishop asked about married priests and whether they would be allowed to marry after they were ordained.   Steenson said the priests being received right now are married, and this involves special permission by the Holy Father for each one.  But after they are ordained they cannot remarry.   [A celibate former Anglican priest cannot marry after he is ordained a Catholic priest].

Another bishop asked when ordinariate clergy might make their contributions in the form of books on the theological contributions of the Ordinariate, helping us to think more deeply, books on spirituality, or on insights into the thinking of Cardinal Newman.

“Certainly!  Soon!, said Steenson who mentioned the reception recently of U.K. church historian Edward Norman.

“My prayer is that I might eventually have a little free time to write something myself,” he said, noting there were several well-trained men received into the Ordinariate who were capable of teaching at the seminary level.

Cardinal Wuerl offered a “word of appreciation to Msgr. Steenson” and thanked him for the “extraordinary job to organize this Ordinariate, launch it and provide it with direction.”

Wuerl then thanked his brother bishops.  ”You welcomed this whole process with open arms,” he said.  He also thanked Bishop Kevin Vann and Bishop Robert McManus for their help.

“Thank you all of your for welcoming this concept and actually making it possible,” Wuerl said.

A bishop asked about Anglican bishops wishing to come in and how one might follow their status.   Steenson replied the Complementary Norms give recognition to the significance of that man’s ministry.  ”He can be permitted to retain the symbols of the office he once held.”

“When men are ready to come forward, to make that step, we meet with them and make sure they recognize the significance of that step,” he said.

The “first read” goes to CDF, which determines whether there are any impediments to ordination. “Then it’s simply a pastoral process of helping the individual work through the spiritual and theological things that have to happen, the transitions . . “

“In my case it took two years,” he said, noting he went through the Pastoral Provision.  ”The Ordinariate process practically speaking takes close to a year.”

Cardinal Dolan, the president of the USCCB, thanked Steenson for his presentation.  ”We rejoice with you.”

Steenson ended by remarking “how wonderful it is to be Catholic.  That’s what you would hear from us.  We are so happy to be home!”

“Excellent!” said Dolan. “That’s the new evangelization!”

There is a video of the address here.

 

Update on the Ordinariate of the Chair of St Peter by Msgr Steenson

The Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter is now nine months old.  Much has happened in that time, and we give God the glory for all of it, the challenges as well as the successes.  One of the most significant moments came in mid-September when the Cardinal Archbishop of Galveston-Houston transferred to the Ordinariate the title to our principal church, Our Lady of Walsingham.  In a similar way, the Diocese of Fort Worth is in the process of transferring St. Mary the Virgin, Arlington, to the Ordinariate.  We have seen some twenty-two priests ordained and incardinated in the Ordinariate, with additional ordinations to come soon.  Also, we will launch a new formation program for the second group of prospective candidates in Advent.

The Ordinariate is planning a pilgrimage to Rome for our clergy and their wives, to coincide with the Feast of the Chair of St. Peter on Feb. 22.  And it really is a pilgrimage!  We will set out to discover the apostolic foundations of the Church of Rome, to participate in the wonderful tradition of Lenten stational masses organized by the Pontifical North American College, and to meet some of the architects of the Ordinariates.  We also hope to greet Msgr. Keith Newton and some of our confreres from the Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham, who will be in Rome at the same time.  And, God willing, there will be an opportunity to thank the Successor of St. Peter himself for the gift of Anglicanorum coetibus.  Your prayers are earnestly requested!

This first year we have focused on establishing the structure of the Ordinariate and on clergy formation.  Now we will be turning more intentionally to congregational development.  If there is one thing that has impressed itself upon me these past months, it is that our congregations must be committed to outreach and growth.  We cannot stay where we are.  Our clergy and their congregations must be committed to evangelization.  The Great Commission is at the heart of the Church’s agenda:  Truth has been given to be proclaimed.  We must acquire the skills and nurture the gifts necessary to gather in a bountiful harvest of faith.

Who and What We Are:  A Primer for Catholics

The Ordinariate is unique in the Roman Catholic Church; however, it comprises many elements similar to other Catholic structures, recognizable to all Catholics.  Consequently, these familiar elements can help to define and explain the Ordinariate, our purpose, and our vision for the future.

In some ways, the Ordinariate is similar to a religious order.  In the same way that the Franciscans and the Dominicans have distinct charisms or missions within the Church, we have a distinct, two-fold charism or mission granted to us by the Holy Father.  This charism must be taken into account in all decisions as we discern our way forward.  We are (1) to minister to the pastoral and spiritual needs of all former Anglicans coming to the Catholic Church and (2) to maintain “the liturgical, spiritual and pastoral traditions of the Anglican communion within the Catholic Church, as a precious gift nourishing the faith of the members of the Ordinariate and as a treasure to be shared” (AC 3).  The decisions we make to plot a course for the Ordinariate must be always with an eye toward both caring for the people specifically entrusted to our care and bringing the fullness of the Anglican patrimony to the Catholic Church.  This is our commission, the commission the Holy Father gave us in Anglicanorum coetibus.

We sometimes receive questions about the relationship between the Ordinariate and certain traditionalist liturgical groups in the Catholic Church.  In answer to these questions, I think the comparison between the Franciscans and the Dominicans is apt.  Saints Francis and Dominic once met to see whether they might combine their efforts and form one religious order.  Although they left their meeting with great respect for each other and for their individual missions, they realized that it was important for the Church that they keep their efforts distinct.  We in the Ordinariate must recognize that our commission to care for former Anglicans and to introduce our distinctive patrimony to the Church is a full-time, life-long calling, similar to but separate from the recovery of the Extraordinary Form within Catholic life.  While our goals might be similar, and while we might support each other’s charism, the charisms are not identical.  To merge the two might divert the Ordinariate from its primary tasks.  We must seek to be faithful to our own distinct charism and patrimony.

We are blessed to be a part of the Catholic Church and all of its liturgical riches.  Sometimes it seems that coming into the Catholic Church is like dining at a smorgasbord – there are so many beautiful choices on the table that we are tempted to sample them all!  I understand this desire, and I have encouraged my clergy to become involved in their local dioceses so that they are able to sample the riches that belong to the Church.  They are welcome to assist at other local parishes, and to celebrate both the Ordinary and Extraordinary forms of the Latin liturgies in the traditions of those diocesan parishes for their parishioners.  In this spirit, we even have had one priest of the Ordinariate supply in a local Eastern Catholic parish.  I want our priests to share in the activities of the presbyterate of their local dioceses.

In many ways, the Ordinariate resembles the personal parishes found in many Latin dioceses.  For example, in the same way that Hispanic, Italian, or Ukrainian parishes often reflect the distinct culture of their people, so too Ordinariate parishes must reflect the “the liturgical, spiritual and pastoral traditions” of our people.  Here we must always go back to the Holy Father’s direction regarding our mission and our charism.  The question must always and necessarily be, “Is it in keeping with our patrimony and tradition?”  Our discernment that a practice is not of our patrimony in no way implies our judgment on its usefulness or spiritual worth.  It simply means that we have made a decision to ensure that our parishes and communities reflect our own distinct patrimony as we strive to be faithful to the Holy Father’s vision.

We must take care too that we not increase membership in the Ordinariate by recruiting baptized Catholics who might be searching for more traditional forms of the liturgy, but rather with those who are coming to the Catholic Church.  The apostolic constitution is very clear on this point.  As we begin this year of faith, with its emphasis on the New Evangelization, the Ordinariate has a tremendous opportunity to contribute to this essential work of the Gospel.

Moving Forward

We have been working on a communications strategy that should, in the near future, greatly enhance our ability to share news and information throughout the Ordinariate communities.  From time to time, certain blogs and websites have made harsh and angry judgments about the Ordinariate.  These must be read with a discerning eye.  At the initial press conference that launched our Ordinariate, I said that I hoped we would bring courtesy and manners with us.  It has always been one of the hallmarks of Anglican life, at least in its ideal form!

The first principle of the Ordinariate is communion – to be in communion with St. Peter and his successors, to be in communion with those bishops in communion with the Bishop of Rome, to be in communion with the Catholic people, to seek communion with those separated from the Church – “that they may be one.”  Some of us have come to the Ordinariate from situations full of conflict, much of it painful, some even scandalous.  As a consequence, we have behaviors to be unlearned, obedience to be given, peace to be discovered.  We do not want to replicate this disorder in our new ecclesial home.  If difficulties should arise, the apostolic constitution is there to defend our distinct patrimony, but let us strive always to be Catholic!  “The character of universality which adorns the people of God is a gift from the Lord himself” (CCC, 831).  Our Anglican identity will find its true soul when united with the whole (CCC, 835).

Your Ordinariate leadership team has been working hard to lay a good foundation on which to build.  It is a complex task that involves collaborating with two episcopal conferences, coordinating with two ecclesiastical delegates, and bringing together groups that formerly were not even in communion with each other.  We have received unanimous support from the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops to create a deanery for the Canadian groups.  I will have the privilege of addressing the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops about our progress at its November meeting.  Rome has received the statutes for our governing council, and once we receive their approval, we will proceed to create a governing council, probably by year’s end.  Until now, three bishops are serving in this capacity.  It is with deep gratitude that I acknowledge the wise counsel of Cardinal Wuerl, Bishop McManus, and Bishop Vann.

Pope Benedict recently sent us his blessings and good wishes, and I am deeply grateful to all of you for joining in this work of Christian unity that is so close to the Holy Father’s heart.

Msgr. Jeffrey Steenson

October 11, 2012

Source

The above is in pdf. here.

 

The Failure of the Ordinariate?

Mr Christian Clay Columba Campbell after giving up The Anglo Catholic blog has a new blog. Sadly, his sentiments and tone remains unchanged:

From a recent comment by Fr. Phillips of Our Lady of the Atonement on Rorate Cæli:

When our parish was established a little over twenty-nine years ago, it was the first of the “Anglican Use” parishes. Although we would like to be part of the Ordinariate in this country, we will be waiting until it is more closely conformed to Pope Benedict’s vision. Speaking for myself, I’m not interested in returning to a form of Episcopalianism, even if it is in communion with the Holy See.

This is exactly what I said at the inauguration of the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter. The Ordinariate, as it is evolving, is not, according to the letter or its spirit, a faithful reflection of the Holy Father’s express will in the Apostolic Constitution Anglicanorum cœtibus. I am not happy to have been the first to make the observation that the purpose of this Ordinariate seemed to be to recreate The Episcopal Church circa 1990, simply without women — or (at least openly) homosexual — bishops. The Ordinary seems a thorough Modernist and is an avowed enemy of Catholic Tradition. While the Rorate Cæli post suggests that Cardinal Wuerl is pulling the strings, I am certain that the Ordinary need not have been unduly pressured to adopt the same positions. After all, it should not be forgotten that Monsignor Steenson is on record as saying that it was only possible for him to become Catholic because of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council!

He rambles on here.

 

Ordinariate Denies Favoritism Charge, TAC Clergy Noticeably Absent

Anglican Ink is reporting:

The head of the U.S. branch of the Anglican Ordinariate, Msg. Jeffrey Steenson, has denied accusations it has given preference to former Episcopal clergy in its ordination process. However, among its first class of priests, 16 of 19 are former Episcopal clergy, with only 3 receiving their formation and orders from the continuing church.

Questions and concerns about the implementation and interpretation of Anglicanorum coetibus have met the Vatican’s initiative to create a liturgical home for Anglicans with the Roman Catholic Church. In an interview with PBS’s Religion and Ethics Newsweekly, Dr. Ian Markham, Dean of the Virginia Theological Seminary criticized the pastoral provision for Anglicans for sheep stealing.

“There was a perception that this was poaching by the Roman Catholic Church of Anglicans around the world. It was discourteous, it was stealing sheep, it was unecumenical,” he said, adding “It’s viewed as not recognizing the value of and integrity of our traditions.”

Its critics also charge the sheep stealing is directed towards the Church of England and the Episcopal Church. While talks began in 1991 between leaders of the Traditional Anglican Communion (TAC) and the Vatican on returning Anglican Catholics to Rome, TAC clergy have been noticeably absent from the Ordinariates in the U.S. and U.K. The three TAC bishops who spearheaded the reunion efforts with Rome — David Moyer, John Hepworth and Louis Falk – are absent from the clergy ranks of the Ordinariate.

Some former TAC clergy who have applied for ordination in the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St Peter tell Anglican Ink that they have been treated brusquely.  Others report that a year after contacting the Ordinariate’ s Washington office, they are still waiting to hear what the future holds.

One clergyman, who asked not to be named as he had applied for reception, told Anglican Ink he had been discouraged the “Pastoral Provision was so un-pastoral”.  A “Fort Worth mafia” was dominating the U.S. Ordinariate – Msg. Steenson is a former Fort Worth rector, while the vicar for clergy, the Rt. Rev. Charles Hough III is the former canon to the ordinary of the Diocese of Fort Worth.

A second aspirant said he had been pressed to explain why he had not come to Rome when he left the Episcopal Church some twenty five years ago.  If he accepted papal supremacy and the dogmas of the Catholic Church, why had he delayed a quarter century in making his submission, he was asked, the clergyman told AI.

The question is not an unfair one, however, as the Catholic Church’s self-understanding of its role in the economy of salvation is found in the statements of the Second Vatican Council.

Lumen Gentium14 states: “Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved”, which on its face, would appear to render suspect in Roman eyes those who have held long standing doubts as to the veracity of Anglican truth claims and delayed going over to Rome.

Of the 19 clergy re-ordained for service in the Ordinariate, 7 have come directly from the Episcopal Church, 6 from the Episcopal Church via the Anglican Church in North America, 3 from the Episcopal Church via the Anglican Church in America, 2 from the Anglican Church in America, and 1 from the Charismatic Episcopal Church.

Asked to respond to the assertions of unfair treatement of TAC clergy, Msg. Steenson said:“Not true.  The judgment of Apostolicae curae falls on each of us alike.  We treat each applicant equally, and apply the objective criteria of discernment that the Catholic Church requires.”

This one is open for comment.

 

Ordinariate Denies Crackdown Underway Against Traditionalists

Another over sensational headline, this time courtesy of George Conger:

Claims of bullying of Latin mass clergy untrue.

It all still has to do with Mr Christian Clay Columba Campbell’s undue assessment of Msgr Jeffery Steenson, recently posted on his blog.

The Ordinariate of the Chair of St Peter has dismissed claims that clergy of the newly formed home for Anglicans in the Catholic Church are being bullied by its leader, Msgr. Jeffrey Steenson, for using the traditional Latin mass – the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.

On 29 July 2012 the Anglo-Catholic website posted a story stating Msgr. Steenson had discouraged his clergy from using the Latin mass, directing them to use only approved ordinariate and Catholic English-language liturgies.

Christian Campbell stated that he had it on “unimpeachable authority that there is on ongoing crackdown on those AU/Ordinariate priests who would dare to learn or celebrate the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite on the part of [Msgr.] Steenson” and other ordinariate leaders.

The “affected priests are naturally frightened, and unwilling to go on record, but make no mistake, the leadership of the U.S. Ordinariate at present has set itself against both Summorum Pontificum and Anglicanorum coetibus,” he stated, adding “I also have it on good authority that this intimidation, an abuse of power, is being reported directly to the Roman Authorities. And the contention that the traditional Latin Mass has no bearing on the Anglican Patrimony — this simply has me flabbergasted.”

Other traditionalist Catholic websites picked up the story, with many commentators berating Msgr. Steenson. By not allowing the traditional Latin mass the ordinary was forbidding the use of the liturgy that “shaped the Anglo-Catholic movement.”

“The Mass celebrated by [Blessed] John Henry Newmann is not apt for the Anglican converts of the Ordinariate,” was how one commentator characterized Msgr. Steenson’s actions.

But in a statement posted on the ordinariate’s website, Msgr. Steenson responded to his detractors saying those elements of the Anglican liturgical patrimony incorporated into the liturgical life of the ordinariate sought to balance “two historic principles — that Christian prayer and proclamation should be offered in the vernacular and that the language of worship should be sacral.”

The ordinariate’s “Book of Divine Worship Rite I” was its principle liturgical resource, while “those congregations that prefer a contemporary idiom, the Roman Missal 3rd edition could be used.”

Ordinariate clergy who “want to learn also how to celebrate” according to the traditional Latin mass werecertainly encouraged to do so” under the “supervision of the local bishop,” Msgr. Steenson said, so as to “assist in those stable communities that use the Extraordinary Form.”

However the traditional Latin Mass, (the Extraordinary Form) “is not integral to the Anglican patrimony, it is not properly used in our communities,” Msgr. Steenson wrote.

A spokesman for the ordinariate told Anglican Ink that over the past seven months, Msgr. Steenson “has undertaken the incredible task of building what is essentially a national diocese from the ground up, and with few resources.”

“Looking back, we can see all that has been accomplished, including a high quality application and formation program for clergy; ordinations of more than 20 priests in two countries in just six months – with more on the way; new communities being received into the Ordinariate regularly, with the next one in Boston this August; and policies, procedures and a structure being put in place to ensure the Ordinariate has a firm foundation for a healthy future.”

However, she noted that “bloggers always will speculate, but the focus of the Ordinariate continues to be on building up this new community of faith, with a healthy presbyterate and healthy local communities.”

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 825 other followers